|
Congress Topic 1, Theme 3
What should be the rule
The national and international standards and regulations play a key role for the development of organic agriculture. The aim of Theme 3 is to elucidate and discuss rules and values in relation to the development of organic agriculture. The theme will discuss rules and values at three levels:
- In relation to values and principles as a basis for the regulation
- In relation to the differences between different regulations and standards in Europe
- In relation to specific areas like derogations on feed and seed
Within Theme 3 the following three consecutive sessions of 1,5 hours each are planned:
1. Regional differences in organic standards opportunity or problem
2. How local is local - values and integrity of organic farming
3. Criteria for evaluation of inputs and derogations
Regional differences in organic standards opportunity or problem
This session concerns the question whether the differences between organic standards in the EU should be seen as an opportunity or a problem for development of organic farming and free trade of organic products within the EU and world wide. Differences in national and private organic standards compared to the EEC2092/91 have often given rise to discussion of “who are most organic?” Besides, they may be used for national protectionism in relation to free trade of organic products within the EEC and between the EEC countries and third countries. Do common rules (the EEC 2092/91) conflict with locally adapted practices?", "Are these conflicts within the organic values or are they due to other societal values (such as free trade)?". In the EEC 2092/91 REVISION project the database Organic Rules (www.organicrules.org) has recently been developed for identification of such differences in order to be able to analyse the reasons for and the consequences of various differences in relation to the basic ethical values of organic farming, e.g. outdoor pig and poultry production in relation to animal welfare, food safety and environment etc.
In this session we will discuss whether such differences should be seen as a problem or an opportunity for the development of organic farming. We therefore invite prospective participants to look at questions such as:
- What are the reasons for the regional differences, e.g. different climate, culture, or protectionism, or do the differences reflect different prioritizing of the ethical values?
- Do common rules (the EEC 2092/91) conflict with the locally adapted practices and if so, are such conflicts a question of different interpretation of the organic values or are they due to “external” societal values (economical reasons, protectionism/free trade etc.)?
- How do we make rules so there is room for development of organic farming at different stages of development and in different climatic and geographic regions?
How local is local - values and integrity of organic farming
This session concerns the values, conflicts and integrity of organic farming. Values and ethics are key concerns of organic agriculture, and both the EEC and IFOAM have highlighted their importance in the new proposal for a revised EEC 2092/91 Regulation ((COM2005) 671 final) and the new IFOAM Principles of Organic Agriculture from September, 2005. However, the ethical values also give rise to conflicts and debates concerning the development of organic farming in a time where intensification, specialisation and globalisation are factors of increasing importance.
In this session we will discuss problematic aspects of modern organic agriculture such as transport distance, dependency on conventional agriculture, intensification and specialisation of the production and similar issues. We invite prospective participants to look at questions such as
- What is local?, How local is local?, Why local?, What are the problems of “non-local”?
- What is intensification?, Are there any ethical differences between different means of efficiency and specialisation and if so why are some means more acceptable than others? Where are the limits to increased efficiency and specialisation”?
Criteria for evaluation of inputs and derogations
This session concerns the development of criteria for evaluation of inputs and derogations on inputs. Organic farming is based on a system approach, which aims at closing natural cycles within the farm or within a region. “Non-organic” inputs are considered problematic by the consumers, because they carry risks of contamination, but they may be a real need for producers and processors for various reasons. Today there are a range of derogations in the EU regulation, which allow the use of some conventional feed products, feed additives, fertilizers and plant protection products (Annex II of the EU Regulation). Scientific and technical development may make inputs available, which respect better the principles of organic farming and perform better than the inputs listed at present in Annex II of the EEC 2092/91. Therefore there is a need to review common thinking about the use of “non-organic” inputs in organic agriculture and the way this is communicated to the consumers.
In this session we will discuss if the reality of organic farming justifies to think of it as a system, which in principle should be free of non-organic inputs, which many consumers believe. We encourage prospective participants to consider questions as:
- How do we reduce the reliance on non-organic inputs without seriously reducing the growth in organic farming?
- Which inputs are (really) necessary?
- When is an input “non-organic”?
- Which inputs can be accepted for organic agriculture still to be considered organic?
- How do we evaluate, select and assess the inputs that may be acceptable in organic farming?
|